![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
My client has a SQL Server 2008 backend with an ACCESS 2007 front end. Most of the tables work fine linked using ODBC. However, two of them do not let me edit them as linked tables. I can make changes to the data using the SQL Server Management studio, but when I try to do that through the linked MS Access table it tells me that someone else has edited the table, even though that is not so. It will save the correct data to the clipboard if I select that option, but I can't figure out why it is locking the record. The SQL Server is encrypted using the built in microsoft encryption. All my other linked tables work fine...(there are lots of them.) i am pretty comfortable with Access but my SQL skills are limited... Any clues would be appreciated. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Nov 10, 6:49*pm, Jim Mandala <jim.mand... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: My client has a SQL Server 2008 backend with an ACCESS 2007 front end. Most of the tables work fine linked using ODBC. However, two of them do not let me edit them as linked tables. I can make changes to the data using the SQL Server Management studio, but when I try to do that through the linked MS Access table it tells me that someone else has edited the table, even though that is not so. It will save the correct data to the clipboard if I select that option, but I can't figure out why it is locking the record. The SQL Server is encrypted using the built in microsoft encryption. All my other linked tables work fine...(there are lots of them.) i am pretty comfortable with Access but my SQL skills are limited... Any clues would be appreciated. search 'timestamp field' in the newsgroup, there are good explanation as to why your table needs one |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |