![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm setting up a project for a client on a new Windows Terminal Server. The application is currently in A2K, but the sysadmin does not want to install that, he wants to install A2K3, because Office 2K3 is the organization's new standard (they want to be fully converted within the new calendar year). What issues will I have, if any, with A2K3 on WTS? Anything different from A2K? Anything not specific to WTS that I need to know about A2K3, which I've never used, ever? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm setting up a project for a client on a new Windows Terminal Server. The application is currently in A2K, but the sysadmin does not want to install that, he wants to install A2K3, because Office 2K3 is the organization's new standard (they want to be fully converted within the new calendar year). What issues will I have, if any, with A2K3 on WTS? Anything different from A2K? Anything not specific to WTS that I need to know about A2K3, which I've never used, ever? -- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
So far I am impressed with the Access 2000 compatibility mode in Access 2003. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7744 (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote in news fv6t01kovm7mr0dq8lcjcf7oqcqdero30 (AT) 4ax (DOT) com:So far I am impressed with the Access 2000 compatibility mode in Access 2003. What does that mean? Can I set it from code? Can I configure the WTS users to run in A2K compatibility mode without logging on as each one? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
What I meant was, that running an Access2000 application in Access2003 is entirely seamless. No need to set anything. Just really good backward compatibility from your friends at MSFT. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7744 (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote in news:q4f9t01403gjqic3mkog9l5ptlur3nlapb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com: What I meant was, that running an Access2000 application in Access2003 is entirely seamless. No need to set anything. Just really good backward compatibility from your friends at MSFT. What about the code signing thing? Don't you have to turn something off in Access to get it to stop nagging you about unsafe code execution? |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
David W. Fenton wrote: Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7744 (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote in news:q4f9t01403gjqic3mkog9l5ptlur3nlapb (AT) 4ax (DOT) com: What I meant was, that running an Access2000 application in Access2003 is entirely seamless. No need to set anything. Just really good backward compatibility from your friends at MSFT. What about the code signing thing? Don't you have to turn something off in Access to get it to stop nagging you about unsafe code execution? Set Macro Security to Low, just like in Word/Excel. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tom van Stiphout <no.spam.tom7744 (AT) cox (DOT) net> wrote: Set Macro Security to Low, just like in Word/Excel. Where? Can it be done in code? Can the base installation of Access be configured this way so that all users inherit that setting when they log on for the first time? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Set Macro Security to Low, just like in Word/Excel. Where? Can it be done in code? Can the base installation of Access be configured this way so that all users inherit that setting when they log on for the first time? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |