 | |
#1
 
| ||||
| ||||
|
Whatever happened to Jasmine -
02-13-2011
, 03:57 AM
|
On Feb 8, 3:06*pm, Geo Victim <geovic... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: [...] 3. Why are Ingres Corp. pushing Vectorwise over its own RDBMS like CA tried pushing Jasmine and neglecting Ingres? [...] |
Quote:
|
whatever happened to Jasmine.....or any other OO db ? |
Quote:
|
I am now using Postgres, which describes itself as an ORDBMS....it seems just like an RDBMS to me |
data types. The blockheads behind Jasmine thought classes were
tables. An elementary but catastrophic blunder.
Quote:
|
ps Ingres always suffered from 'low-visibility' |
--
Roy
UK Ingres User Association Conference 2011 will be on Tuesday June 7 2011.
Put the date in your diary today.
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm starting a new thread for this. michaelnewp... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com wrote: On Feb 8, 3:06 pm, Geo Victim <geovic... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: [...] 3. Why are Ingres Corp. pushing Vectorwise over its own RDBMS like CA tried pushing Jasmine and neglecting Ingres? [...] whatever happened to Jasmine.....or any other OO db ? It's a zero billion dollar business. I am now using Postgres, which describes itself as an ORDBMS....it seems just like an RDBMS to me Well spotted. *The clever folks behind it understand that classes are data types. *The blockheads behind Jasmine thought classes were tables. *An elementary but catastrophic blunder. * ps Ingres always suffered from 'low-visibility' Set up some Google Alerts to see how that's changed. |
in the meantime you can discuss with Mladen.....
 |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
| |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.