dbTalk Databases Forums  

Re: [Info-Ingres] Replicator

comp.databases.ingres comp.databases.ingres


Discuss Re: [Info-Ingres] Replicator in the comp.databases.ingres forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Eric Mischke
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [Info-Ingres] Replicator - 02-09-2009 , 02:30 PM







Regarding Ingres Replicator, I'm happy to report that we do have it working
in a production environment, in a primary database replicates to an
emergency backup configuration. It took some work to get there, but it has
been solid for well over a year now.

That said, I'd hesitate before trying to use it in a configuration to keep
two databases in sync with each other. I'm not sure that I would want to try
to take it any farther than where we have it right now.

Eric Mischke

-----Original Message-----
From: info-ingres-bounces (AT) kettleriver...ting (DOT) com
[mailto:info-ingres-bounces (AT) kettleriverconsulting (DOT) com] On Behalf Of Karl &
Betty Schendel
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:09 AM
To: Ingres and related product discussion forum
Subject: Re: [Info-Ingres] Replicator


On Feb 5, 2009, at 7:34 AM, Colin Hay wrote:

Quote:
Our client has an Ingres 2.6 database and an OpenROAD 4.1 application

Rather than do a complete upgrade for all users, they want to create
an Ingres 2006 (or Ingres 9.2) database and run the OpenROAD 2006
version of the same application on that for just a subset of users for
now

However they DO want to keep some tables in both these databases in
sync

I assume Replicator is the product for this - is it easy to use, does
it work properly, what are peoples opinions, or is there a better
tool/ method out there ?
No, it's not particularly easy to use. It's a fussy and delicate bolt-on.
Given its history, it's actually better than it has any right to be, but
that doesn't make it any more usable.

If your client is doing this for risk mitigation, then I have to suggest
that any real-time replication scheme is going to end up being harder and
riskier than just upgrading everyone. If they insist, the suggestions of
HVR or Star are reasonable.

If they don't have a requirement for real-time updating, i.e. if one side
can be out of date by a few minutes, it might be worth investigating the new
incremental journaling feature -- I think it's delivered with 9.2, isn't it?
Journal out of one database and rollforward into the other. Of course that
only works if updates only flow in one direction. If you have bidirectional
updating, you're back to a replicator, or Star, or don't-do-that. (The
latter is my preferred option.)

Karl

_______________________________________________
Info-Ingres mailing list
Info-Ingres (AT) kettleriverconsulting (DOT) com
http://www.kettleriverconsulting.com...fo/info-ingres




Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Rob Leather
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [Info-Ingres] Replicator - 02-09-2009 , 02:43 PM







I will be out of the office now until Monday 16th February, and will
respond to your e-mail as soon as I can upon my return.

If the matter is urgent, please raise a call via the ICT
Helpdesk.


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of the
London Borough of Havering, are confidential, may be subject to legal privilege
and are intended only for the person(s) or organisation(s) named above.
Any unauthorised use, retention, distribution, copying or disclosure
is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please notify
the sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your system.
WARNING: It is your responsibility to take all necessary steps to
ensure this e-mail and any attachments to it are free from viruses.

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.