Better get over to www.ingres.com and download a copy. Looks like it
has lots of good stuff in it.

Some of my favorites are:

- better default configuration
- incremental rollforward (to a standby database)
- cached dynamic cursor query plans
- IPM and iimonitor now display cursor definitions (yay!!)

My only teansy-weansy quibble is that it is now offically called Ingres
Database 9.2. It ain't a database. It's a DBMS. Big difference. Oh
well, it's a small price to pay for getting rid of that (literally)
retarded year designation from the name, I guess.

If you want to know how come it's 9.2, Emma has blogged about it.

--
Roy

UK Ingres User Association Conference 2009 will be on Tuesday June 9, 2009
Go to http://www.iua.org.uk/join to get on the mailing list.

Roy Hann wrote:
[snip]
Yeah, that's an unfortunate misuse of the term "database" applied to the
DBMS that's all too common. I can concede "laptop" vs. "notebook"
computer, but I can't swallow "database" where it should be DBMS. I
work in an environment that utilizes Microsoft SQL Server and they've
devolved to not just referring to a DBMS as a "database", but some think
that all "database" are "SQL Server", or just "SQL". Maddening.

Of course, it could be worse. They could've named it "INGRES Party
Favour 9.2", since "Icebreaker" was already taken.

***
Mark R. Winston
***

Hi

I'm a long time Ingres user and sometime poster to this, and the
OpenROAD, list.
I'm UK based and available @ short notice, or from 1st Jan.
I have ABF, C, Unix Shell, OpenROAD, etc skills - including Support,
Admin & DBA - in both Local & Central Gov, and also utilities.
For my CV etc, please use my private email: dave @ skybeam dot plus dot
com.

Regards
Dave

__________________________________________________ _____

Atos Origin and Atos Consulting are trading names used by the Atos Origin group. The following trading entities are registered in England and Wales: Atos Origin IT Services UK Limited (registered number 01245534) and Atos Consulting Limited (registered number 04312380). The registered office for each is at 4 Triton Square, Regents Place, London, NW1 3HG.

This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee, and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this e-mail in error, you are not authorised to copy, disclose, use or retain it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your systems. As emails may be intercepted, amended or lost, they are not secure. Atos Origin therefore can accept no liability for any errors or their content. Although Atos Origin endeavours to maintain a virus-free network, we do not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and can accept no liability for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. The risks are deemed to be accepted by everyone who communicates with Atos Origin by email.
__________________________________________________ _____

On Nov 19, 7:23*am, "Mark R. Winston" <winsto... (AT) datavailable (DOT) com>
wrote:
But MS still refers to sql server as a RDBMS instead of DBMS. As if
anyone there knows what the R part is

www.beyondsql.blogspot.com

steve11228 (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote:

The R is bogus anyway. Nobody--least of all MS--sells an RDBMS; they're
all SQL DBMSs. Again, a big difference.

But while we're on this pedantic streak, I have noticed in the last few
years that end-users (or at least their managers) use the term
"database" when they mean "application". This is actually quite
important because a couple of times when doing bids and proposals we've
realized too late that we've been talking at cross-purposes with the
customer.

Personally I'd be glad to see the word "database" completely abolished.

--
Roy

UK Ingres User Association Conference 2009 will be on Tuesday June 9, 2009
Go to http://www.iua.org.uk/join to get on the mailing list.

On Nov 20, 2:14*am, Roy Hann <specia... (AT) processed (DOT) almost.meat> wrote:
You may be on to something here. The relational community does write
with a pedantic slant. After all, if you're trying to describe the
science of data it's hardly surprising. But I fear they overlook the
idea that those in their target audience are not yet scientists. To
keep their interest perhaps a more creative and entertaining style is
warranted without compromising the key concepts. I thus describe some
of my own work Recently while talking to some net folks about
Dataphor I referred to it as a RAD tool, R(elational) A(ccelerator) D
(evelopment). As opposed to sql (Sql Server) which is a R(apid) D(e-
acceleration) D(evelopment) tool. (This was well received Somewhat
sophomoric but entertaining. Perhaps you have to give users something
other than relvars to hang their tables on

I tend towards this too. Just shorten it to "data". Maybe there is no
basis, nor utility in the rest of it

best,
steve dassin

Blogging about smashing data with Dataphor
www.beyondsql.blogspot.com

Roy Hann escreveu:
Just for Solaris ? When linux x86_64 comes out ?

--
Regards,

Thiago Zerbinato
Oracle/Ingres DBA
Ribeirao Preto/SP
Brazil