dbTalk Databases Forums  

[Info-Ingres] ProjectD on Mac OS X

comp.databases.ingres comp.databases.ingres


Discuss [Info-Ingres] ProjectD on Mac OS X in the comp.databases.ingres forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old   
James K. Lowden
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [Info-Ingres] ProjectD on Mac OS X - 05-16-2011 , 09:00 PM






On Mon, 16 May 2011 21:48:54 -0400
Karl Schendel <schendel (AT) kbcomputer (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
If you plug in the environment variables I mentioned a few emails
back, it should look for xerces 3.x instead. Although I guess you
did that:
Yes, I did. The bldenv in projectD has a bunch of hard-coded
references to .so.27.0. I ripped out what I found, but I didn't find
everything. ;-)

Quote:
Don't screw around with merging that one. Just copy all of the
adf/adl stuff from main to your projectD branch and I suspect it
might start to work. I do recall that I had to do a certain amount
of c++ ish stuff to fix the xerces interface. I don't think much in
adf/adl changed functionally over the last couple years.
OK, thanks! Before sending up the white flag, I'll put my raft in that
river and see where it goes.

Quote:
As for front/ice, you can pretty much ignore it if there are errors.
Karl, thanks again for your patient help.

Regards,

--jkl

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old   
James K. Lowden
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [Info-Ingres] ProjectD on Mac OS X - 05-16-2011 , 09:03 PM






On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:13:55 -0500
Ingres Forums <info-ingres (AT) kettleriverconsulting (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:
clsigs.h in projectD is a bit out of date with main. I suggest you
sync clsigs.h with 'ingres - Revision 4281: /main'
That worked, by the way. :-)

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old   
James K. Lowden
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: [Info-Ingres] ProjectD on Mac OS X - 05-16-2011 , 09:10 PM



On Mon, 16 May 2011 21:37:18 -0400
"James K. Lowden" <jklowden (AT) schemamania (DOT) org> wrote:

Quote:
I was able to build projectD on Ubuntu
Linux with similar patches.
One brief comment on my patch. I don't understand the apparent
reluctance/conservatism w.r.t. iostream vs. iostream.h and the std::
namespace. Everything I compile on uses GNU or Microsoft's compiler,
and has used the std:: namespace for, what, 15 years? At least.

So, my approach was just to rip out all references to iostream.h, make
sure to reference std:stream in the .hpp files (that's the *only*
reference!) and add "using namespace std;" to the .cpp files.

Is there really an environment these days still using the pre-standard
header files? That Ingres would support?

I'm just asking....

--jkl

Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.