![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Does anybody have experience with v10 of Workgroup Edition? Now that HDR is available as a Workgroup option, we are looking at saving a LOT of money by migrating down from Enterprise. Is it the same core engine? Will I have the same performance? What besides ER (which we don't use) will I be giving up? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
"Jeff" <nobody@localhost> wrote in message news:4676ce6b$1 (AT) news (DOT) mcleodusa.net... Does anybody have experience with v10 of Workgroup Edition? Now that HDR is available as a Workgroup option, we are looking at saving a LOT of money by migrating down from Enterprise. Is it the same core engine? Will I have the same performance? What besides ER (which we don't use) will I be giving up? I started off answering this by saying confidentally that I think the code streams are identical, and that you are left *not* to use the precluded functionality on an honour basis. Certainly I just checked a PPA download site for one of my customers who has both Enterprise and Workgroup and there is not a separate download for the latter. But also I recall some while back being unable to allocate more than 4 cpu vps with a Workgroup download - perhaps it was the IIUG freebie. So now I'm not certain! Anyway you shouldn't use IDS in contravention of its terms because IBM has a zealous Compliance programme, as is its right. To answer your question: I have lots of experience in multiple customer sites, and it's fine so long as you can do without parallel backups and parallel queries. Typically then this favours small-to-medium database servers and OLTP applications. It might also be thought that 4 processor cores and 8g memory - the IDS v10 Workgroup infrastructure limit - is getting a little restrictive the way hardware is going. I'm interested to know how you'll save money by "trading down". You can't get a refund on the Enterprise licences you presumably already own. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm interested to know how you'll save money by "trading down". You can't get a refund on the Enterprise licences you presumably already own. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Neil Truby wrote: I'm interested to know how you'll save money by "trading down". You can't get a refund on the Enterprise licences you presumably already own. The annual support will be cheaper. I don't really know if you can exchange existing licenses... |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Fernando Nunes wrote: Neil Truby wrote: I'm interested to know how you'll save money by "trading down". You can't get a refund on the Enterprise licences you presumably already own. The annual support will be cheaper. I don't really know if you can exchange existing licenses... As it turned out, it will not save any money. Yes the support would save us money, but it would take many years to make back the expense of re-purchasing initial licenses. |
|
The hardware limits of Workgroup would not have been a problem for us. We are a smallish company with pretty basic OLTP needs. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |