![]() | |
#21
| |||
| |||
|
|
From: Art S. Kagel [mailto:kagel (AT) erols (DOT) com] Keep moving us towards a no-down-time server as much as possible. Such as (some mentioned by others): - Online index build - without locking the table - A dirty read is used to build the index then logical log records are replayed to clean up keys that were added, rolled back, or deleted during the build. During the build the index is marked disabled and is reenabled once the build is completed. |
#22
| |||
| |||
|
|
From: Art S. Kagel [mailto:kagel (AT) erols (DOT) com] Keep moving us towards a no-down-time server as much as possible. Such as (some mentioned by others): - Online index build - without locking the table - A dirty read is used to build the index then logical log records are replayed to clean up keys that were added, rolled back, or deleted during the build. During the build the index is marked disabled and is reenabled once the build is completed. |
#23
| |||
| |||
|
|
From: Art S. Kagel [mailto:kagel (AT) erols (DOT) com] Keep moving us towards a no-down-time server as much as possible. Such as (some mentioned by others): - Online index build - without locking the table - A dirty read is used to build the index then logical log records are replayed to clean up keys that were added, rolled back, or deleted during the build. During the build the index is marked disabled and is reenabled once the build is completed. |
#24
| |||
| |||
|
|
From: Art S. Kagel [mailto:kagel (AT) erols (DOT) com] Keep moving us towards a no-down-time server as much as possible. Such as (some mentioned by others): - Online index build - without locking the table - A dirty read is used to build the index then logical log records are replayed to clean up keys that were added, rolled back, or deleted during the build. During the build the index is marked disabled and is reenabled once the build is completed. |
#25
| |||
| |||
|
|
As a mild diversion from the IDS-DB2 conversion thread, its time for one of my more favorite exercises. ;-) We are nearing the end of the coding cycle for IDS 9.5. We've got a whole bunch of really cool stuff in place and - well - its time to get input from you guys as to what you want to see in the 9.6 release. Now, I know that everyone's favorite thing is going to be "marketing", but I'm in development. So I need to talk features and functionality. So feel free to send them on in. Just an FYI - I'll be away for a while and won't be able to get email via my comcast email address. But, I'll be following the newsgroup rather closely. Also, next week I'll be in some planning meeting. So getting responses back fairly quickly would really help. Thanks M.Pruet |
#26
| |||
| |||
|
|
2. create table..with no first extent size specified should not allocate an extent (why waste space if the table is not used by this particular customer e.g. SAP/Baan etc with 40,000 tables!!) Uhum.. yep heard about that one. |
#27
| |||
| |||
|
#28
| |||
| |||
|
#29
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- From: Alexey Sonkin [mailto:alexeis (AT) grandvirtual (DOT) com] snipped The other feature highly desirable for 24x7 is: GET RID OF ERROR 710!!!! (After alter table, build index, etc) That is, after executing any DDL statement that changes table version all prepared SQL statements, open cursors and stored procedures related to that table became invalid, and user session get -710 error. |
#30
| |||
| |||
|
|
-----Original Message----- From: Alexey Sonkin [mailto:alexeis (AT) grandvirtual (DOT) com] snipped The other feature highly desirable for 24x7 is: GET RID OF ERROR 710!!!! (After alter table, build index, etc) That is, after executing any DDL statement that changes table version all prepared SQL statements, open cursors and stored procedures related to that table became invalid, and user session get -710 error. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |