dbTalk Databases Forums  

Informix beats Oracle

comp.databases.informix comp.databases.informix


Discuss Informix beats Oracle in the comp.databases.informix forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #281  
Old   
Fernando Nunes
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Informix beats Oracle - 07-06-2007 , 05:34 AM






DA Morgan wrote:
Quote:
Fernando Nunes wrote:

Again... If I want sand in my eyes I'll prefer a trip to the desert...
Would you care to make that WITH a DEFAULT VALUE as I mentioned all
along?! If it returns immediately please tell me the version... I'll
send it to the Oracle DBAs...

It doesn't and it won't. You can not visit tens of thousands of blocks
instantly. But it can be done without locking. Something, alas, you've
just received in Cheetah.
Ignore it as much as you want, but in IDS (not needing Cheetah) it returns
immediately. As I wrote earlier, it makes an inplace ALTER. You can do
something similar, because when you add a column it won't physically change or
visit all the table blocks... right? With the default the same happens... why?
because, if the column wasn't there, than the column value was evidently NULL
and so, if you select a previous row it will return the DEFAULT.
Go on... give Larry a call and ask for it, or confirm if it's in 11g... My
fellow Orace DBAs would pay for it more easily than they'd pay for flashback or
RAC.

So, your statement should be "It doesn't IN ORACLE". I remove the part "it
WON'T IN ORACLE" because i believe sometime they'll catch up.

I think it's my time now to step off this thread. I'm tired of having to write
2 or 3 posts to make you admit your errors and false statements. I easily admit
and don't mind to repeat here, that there are several features in other
databases that I'd like to see implemented in IDS. A few of us even know I've
done my best to influence their implementation. That's simply because I'd like
to see more functionality on top of what I think it's a very good RDBMS. The
lack of some features don't change my current opinion, and the fact that I see
it being used with success in very demanding conditions, with very low
maintenance (aka DBAs time).

It's been nice to check some features in Oracle, and learn a bit more about it,
but it's enough... If I need more I'll check the Internet... It's less tiring
than pointing your mistakes.

Regards.

--
Fernando Nunes
Portugal

http://informix-technology.blogspot.com
My email works... but I don't check it frequently...


Reply With Quote
  #282  
Old   
Serge Rielau
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Informix beats Oracle - 07-06-2007 , 07:15 AM






DA Morgan wrote:
Quote:
Fernando Nunes wrote:

Again... If I want sand in my eyes I'll prefer a trip to the desert...
Would you care to make that WITH a DEFAULT VALUE as I mentioned all
along?! If it returns immediately please tell me the version... I'll
send it to the Oracle DBAs...

It doesn't and it won't. You can not visit tens of thousands of blocks
instantly. But it can be done without locking. Something, alas, you've
just received in Cheetah.
You don't need to. Adding a column with default is no different than one
without. Because the default DEFAULT is NULL. It's just another
constant. There is no need to visit anything more than the meta data.

IBM has been using this "technology" since before I joined 10 years ago.
(Gee.. I'm getting old). Anyway don't you guys think this thread is
getting abit lengthy. You'll wreck Mark T.s beautyfull statistics and
Daniel is most certainly on his path to "all time top poster" ;-)

Cheers
Serge
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab


Reply With Quote
  #283  
Old   
Obnoxio The Clown
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Informix beats Oracle - 07-06-2007 , 07:32 AM




Serge Rielau said:
Quote:
Daniel is most certainly on his path to "all time top poster" ;-)
And that would mean war ... >)

--
Bye now,
Obnoxio

"I'm astonished anyone pays real money for this crap."
-- Cosmo

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is
believed to be clean.



Reply With Quote
  #284  
Old   
Gentsch, Samuel
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Informix beats Oracle - 07-06-2007 , 08:56 AM



Quote:
... Anyway don't you guys think this thread is
getting abit lengthy. You'll wreck Mark T.s beautyfull statistics and
Daniel is most certainly on his path to "all time top poster" ;-)

Cheers
Serge

Amen, can we put this bloody horse under the pasture?


Reply With Quote
  #285  
Old   
DA Morgan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Informix beats Oracle - 07-06-2007 , 09:36 AM



Fernando Nunes wrote:
Quote:
DA Morgan wrote:
Fernando Nunes wrote:

Again... If I want sand in my eyes I'll prefer a trip to the desert...
Would you care to make that WITH a DEFAULT VALUE as I mentioned all
along?! If it returns immediately please tell me the version... I'll
send it to the Oracle DBAs...

It doesn't and it won't. You can not visit tens of thousands of blocks
instantly. But it can be done without locking. Something, alas, you've
just received in Cheetah.

Ignore it as much as you want, but in IDS (not needing Cheetah) it
returns immediately. As I wrote earlier, it makes an inplace ALTER.
I'll check it out. But I must confess the last time I had to do this in
a production database was ... let me see ... well never. But it is
interesting. Thanks for the tip.

And lets kill this thread before I become a regular. ;-)
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)


Reply With Quote
  #286  
Old   
Madison Pruet
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Informix beats Oracle - 07-06-2007 , 11:30 AM



DA Morgan wrote:
Quote:

I'll check it out. But I must confess the last time I had to do this in
a production database was ... let me see ... well never. But it is
interesting. Thanks for the tip.

And lets kill this thread before I become a regular. ;-)
Too Late ;-)


Reply With Quote
  #287  
Old   
Dirk Moolman
 
Posts: n/a

Default RE: Informix beats Oracle - 07-08-2007 , 01:07 PM




-----Original Message-----
From: informix-list-bounces (AT) iiug (DOT) org
[mailto:informix-list-bounces (AT) iiug (DOT) org] On Behalf Of DA Morgan
Sent: 05 July 2007 08:35 PM
To: informix-list (AT) iiug (DOT) org
Subject: Re: Informix beats Oracle

Dirk Moolman wrote:
Quote:
When you start working with Oracle, you really start missing the
simple
tools - like onstat, and dbaccess, with its "unload to ... select *
from
...."

You are comparing Informix 2007 with Oracle 1997. The delta is 0.

My collegues are still comparing IDS 7 with Oracle 10G - completely not
fair

:-/


*** Disclaimer ***

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and legally privileged and is intended solely for the addressee and to others who have the authority to receive it. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized and as such, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on it is unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately.

The views expressed in this e-mail are the views of the individual sender and should in no way be construed as the views of the Company.

The Company is not liable to ensure that outgoing e-mails are virus-free.

The Company is not liable, should information or data, for whatever reason, be corrupted or fail to reach its intended addressee.

The Company is not liable for any loss or damage of whatsoever nature and howsoever arising resulting from the opening or the use of the information in this e-mail, including its attachments and links.

The sender of this e-mail is subject to and bound by the terms and conditions of Company+IBk-s Electronic Communications Usage Policy.


Reply With Quote
  #288  
Old   
John Carlson
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Informix beats Oracle - 07-16-2007 , 09:27 PM



Dirk Moolman wrote:
Quote:
-----Original Message-----
From: informix-list-bounces (AT) iiug (DOT) org
[mailto:informix-list-bounces (AT) iiug (DOT) org] On Behalf Of DA Morgan
Sent: 05 July 2007 08:35 PM
To: informix-list (AT) iiug (DOT) org
Subject: Re: Informix beats Oracle

Dirk Moolman wrote:
When you start working with Oracle, you really start missing the
simple
tools - like onstat, and dbaccess, with its "unload to ... select *
from
...."

You are comparing Informix 2007 with Oracle 1997. The delta is 0.


My collegues are still comparing IDS 7 with Oracle 10G - completely not
fair

:-/

Ask them about online backups . .. (snicker) . .

JWC


Reply With Quote
  #289  
Old   
DA Morgan
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Informix beats Oracle - 07-16-2007 , 10:34 PM



John Carlson wrote:

Quote:
Ask them about online backups . .. (snicker) . .

JWC
And you will discover that in the current millenium they can be
performed, easily, with all major commercial RDBMS products.

Snicker indeed.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond)


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.