![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have unload job that uses query expression to unload the data from table. After the unload job finishes it reports correct no. of rows that was unloaded. But when I check the output file I see that unload job didn't unload all the columns and have concatenated another row in some places, which is really messing things up. Could you somebody tell me what could be the reason ? For example if I am expecting output: 1|2|3|ABC 4|5|6|DEF I get: 1|2|4|5|6|DEF as one row. _______________________________________________ Informix-list mailing list Informix-list (AT) iiug (DOT) org http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list Platform? O/S? IDS Version? Query? The contributors to this list are |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Some rows got concatenated but it unloaded the right number of rows? so there are duplicate rows somewhere? or random extra rows? What happens if you just run thequeryin dbaccess? does the same concatenation occur? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Jul 4, 2:39 am, scottishpoet <drybur... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Some rows got concatenated but it unloaded the right number of rows? so there are duplicate rows somewhere? or random extra rows? What happens if you just run thequeryin dbaccess? does the same concatenation occur? IDS 10 running on HP-UX 11. Query is a simple select * from abc where a > 100; Yes. Some rows got concatenated but log shows that right number of rows were unloaded. So If I take the count of lines in the file that has the unloaded data it has less number of rows because some of them were concatenated. When I run thought dbaccess it unloads properly. Also if I remove where clause from the query then it works fine. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
mohitanch... (AT) gmail (DOT) com wrote: On Jul 4, 2:39 am, scottishpoet <drybur... (AT) yahoo (DOT) com> wrote: Some rows got concatenated but it unloaded the right number of rows? so there are duplicate rows somewhere? or random extra rows? What happens if you just run thequeryin dbaccess? does the same concatenation occur? IDS 10 running on HP-UX 11.Queryis a simple select * from abc where a > 100; Yes. Some rows got concatenated but log shows that right number of rows were unloaded. So If I take the count of lines in the file that has the unloaded data it has less number of rows because some of them were concatenated. When I run thought dbaccess it unloads properly. Also if I remove where clause from thequerythen it works fine. Weird... Try this: 1- Confirm that the mappings and formats are OK... Or recreate your job. 2- Confirm that the output file is correctly defined... Just one file, not an array etc. 3- If the above fails, post the table schema 4- Consider checking with support... but I never notice any similar bug... 5- Verify your data... can you have weird characters like CONTROL-??? in your data? Regards -- Fernando Nunes Portugal http://informix-technology.blogspot.com My email works... but I don't check it frequently... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |