![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi ! Version is 11.50.FC7 We are currently using ER replication between servers A and B, and we also have ER setup between servers C and D. I am now trying to add replication also between A and C, but I am not able to find the correct way to do this using cdr define server. A, B are not aware of C and D and vice versa. Any ideas anybody ? Ulf |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks for your answer, I suspected that this was the problem. I do not want to replicate from A and B to D, D is outside a firewall. Is there a way to define that A,B, and C is aware of each other and that D is only aware of C ? Yes, you can do this. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 24/09/2010 15:58, Ulf wrote: Thanks for your answer, I suspected that this was the problem. I do not want to replicate from A and B to D, D is outside a firewall. Is there a way to define that A,B, and C is aware of each other and that D is only aware of C ? Yes, you can do this. The following describes the possible topologies : http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...ndex.jsp?topic... I am not sure what you mean by "aware". I assume that you mean that : A and B and C can all directly see each other, and that only C can communicate with D. You can define ER so that traffic to / from D will all go through C (although I think you do not want to replicate *between A and / or B to D, you would probably configure ER up this way). |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi ! Version is 11.50.FC7 We are currently using ER replication between servers A and B, and we also have ER setup between servers C and D. I am now trying to add replication also between A and C, but I am not able to find the correct way to do this using cdr define server. A, B are not aware of C and D and vice versa. Any ideas anybody ? Ulf |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 24/09/2010 15:58, Ulf wrote: Thanks for your answer, I suspected that this was the problem. I do not want to replicate from A and B to D, D is outside a firewall. Is there a way to define that A,B, and C is aware of each other and that D is only aware of C ? Yes, you can do this. The following describes the possible topologies : http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...ndex.jsp?topic... I am not sure what you mean by "aware". I assume that you mean that : A and B and C can all directly see each other, and that only C can communicate with D. You can define ER so that traffic to / from D will all go through C (although I think you do not want to replicate *between A and / or B to D, you would probably configure ER up this way). |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
C. I don't see any issues here. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |