![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
With the 'list tablespaces show detail' command I've get a usage of about 320GB in this tablespace. The *.LB-File in the tablespace is around 310GB (10GB is used by other tables in the tablespace). |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Which version of DB2? With the 'list tablespaces show detail' command I've get a usage of about 320GB in this tablespace. The *.LB-File in the tablespace is around 310GB (10GB is used by other tables in the tablespace). Please post the output of the 'db2 list tablespaces show detail' command for the tablespaces in question. -- Helmut K. C. Tessarek DB2 Performance and Development /* * *Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness * *await thee at its end. */ |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Tablespace ID = 3 Name = MPOD0001 Type = System managed space Contents = Any data State = 0x0000 Detailed explanation: Normal Total pages = 10507119 Useable pages = 10507119 Used pages = 10507119 Free pages = Not applicable High water mark (pages) = Not applicable Page size (bytes) = 32768 Extent size (pages) = 32 Prefetch size (pages) = 32 Number of containers = 1 Minimum recovery time = 2010-02-19-13.52.26.000000 |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Which version of DB2? What is the output of 'db2level'? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Michael, Sorry that it took so long, but I had to talk to one of the developers, since I'm not too familiar with that part of the code. You probably won't like the answer, but here it is anyway: LOBs have to be aligned internally. Depending on the index you are using for the reorg and the variation of LOB sizes, it might be that no space is reclaimed (on disk) during a reorg. But if you are deleting e.g. 10 GB of LOBs and the .LB files don't decrease in size after a reorg, you can insert 10 GB of LOBs again and the .LB files won't increase in size. Hope this helps. -- Helmut K. C. Tessarek DB2 Performance and Development /* * *Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for chaos and madness * *await thee at its end. */ |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
is there a different behaviour with DMS instead of SMS tablespaces and/ or in DB2 V9 or V9.5. Would it help to create a temporary index? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |