![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
About the "Databases can be restored using transportable sets" news: Are transportable sets architecture-independent, so that they can be used to transport a database from - e.g. - AIX64 to Linux x86_64? I do not think so. In the end the technology is based on restore. So the |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 5/29/2010 4:13 AM, Troels Arvin wrote:> About the "Databases can be restored using transportable sets" news: Are transportable sets architecture-independent, so that they can be used to transport a database from - e.g. - AIX64 to Linux x86_64? I do not think so. In the end the technology is based on restore. So the same rules apply. Cheers Serge -- Serge Rielau SQL Architect DB2 for LUW IBM Toronto Lab |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 29 mei, 14:28, Serge Rielau<srie... (AT) ca (DOT) ibm.com> wrote: On 5/29/2010 4:13 AM, Troels Arvin wrote:> About the "Databases can be restored using transportable sets" news: Are transportable sets architecture-independent, so that they can be used to transport a database from - e.g. - AIX64 to Linux x86_64? I do not think so. In the end the technology is based on restore. So the same rules apply. I assume it has the same limitations as a tablespace restore with regards to HADR (ie. not possible). Am I correct? That I do not know.... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |