![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a Mac 10.4 and a Mac OS9. My partner has a newer Mac laptop (not sure which version but I'm sure it is 10.4 or later) I have an older database on the OS9 that I would like to port into Filemaker Pro. If I obtain Filemaker Pro 6.0 and patch it to v.3 I will be able to reprogram the database in Filemaker and port it to the newer machines so my partner can use it as well. Filemaker cust service was less than helpful, saying "because it is unsupported, it is not available anywhere". I -assume- this means, If I purchase Filemaker Pro 6.0 unsupported, it would come without a license which means I could make less than 5 copies (two copies, one for my 10.4 and one for my partner's laptop) but would be unable to upgrade the copies -- my partner would have to purchase a separate copy if he wanted FM10. Then again, since it is not freeware, if it's not available from Filemaker even in unsupported format, how am I supposed to be able to obtain it? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have a Mac 10.4 and a Mac OS9. My partner has a newer Mac laptop (not sure which version but I'm sure it is 10.4 or later) I have an older database on the OS9 that I would like to port into Filemaker Pro. If I obtain Filemaker Pro 6.0 and patch it to v.3 I will be able to reprogram the database in Filemaker and port it to the newer machines so my partner can use it as well. Filemaker cust service was less than helpful, saying "because it is unsupported, it is not available anywhere". I -assume- this means, If I purchase Filemaker Pro 6.0 unsupported, it would come without a license which means I could make less than 5 copies (two copies, one for my 10.4 and one for my partner's laptop) but would be unable to upgrade the copies -- my partner would have to purchase a separate copy if he wanted FM10. Then again, since it is not freeware, if it's not available from Filemaker even in unsupported format, how am I supposed to be able to obtain it? |
#4
| ||||||
| ||||||
|
|
By the way, I run everyday FMDev6 DB on my iMac MacOS X, AND on my PC with Vista Pro. It works as a charm - I am an FM developer -. |
|
Now, if you wish to have the database unique on one of the machines, let it there, be sure there no other copy of the DB on the network - as FMP is very quick in finding another copy of a given file, thus jeopardizing the result... -. Then open the 5003 port (reserved to FileMaker) on every firewall - at least the ones on the OS machines themselves plus on the router(s) - Then make the DB 'multiuser' and allow each copy of FM to have the TCP/IP protocole open. At last, run 'File' / 'Open remote' from the remote computer, and open the (remote) DB. |
|
To use it on two machines you need two licences. (There is an exception for one user being permitted to run a copy on a work computer and on a laptop they take home; they can't be used at the same time, nor by two people.) That is indeed the exact case in my situation. It's a single household; one OS9, one laptop. (The other mac I'm using here at home doesn't need a copy of the program.) Can I network the two copies under this exception? No. The second copy will refuse to run at all if the other installed copy is already running on another computer on the same network. |
|
You would need to quit FileMaker Pro on the desktop computer before running it on the laptop (or vice versa). |
|
You should never use file sharing to access a FileMaker Pro database across a network (copy it to the computer which needs to access it), and you must close the database in FileMaker Pro (or quit the application) before attempting to copy it. |
|
If you had two separate licences, the two copies could run at the same time, one of them could host the database and the other could access it over the network (via FileMaker's built-in sharing protocol, not via standard file sharing). |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks everyone for the input so far. Lynn -- I'm not really sure I understand the idea of a "runtime" version if the two copies are not allowed to access the same file. (I don't need both computers to access the same file simultaneously.) |
|
You should never use file sharing to access a FileMaker Pro database across a network (copy it to the computer which needs to access it), and you must close the database in FileMaker Pro (or quit the application) before attempting to copy it. Does "open remote" do this as mentioned by Remi above? If you had two separate licences, the two copies could run at the same time, one of them could host the database and the other could access it over the network (via FileMaker's built-in sharing protocol, not via standard file sharing). And a second license in and of itself would cost full retail price, since the discount is only for large users. If I purchased a second, opened unused older version of FMPro on Ebay or somewhere, could I use that license to run a second copy of the same FileMaker6 CD, or is each license tied to the software/CD install it comes with? |
)
#6
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Thanks everyone for the input so far. Lynn -- I'm not really sure I understand the idea of a "runtime" version if the two copies are not allowed to access the same file. (I don't need both computers to access the same file simultaneously.) |
|
By the way, I run everyday FMDev6 DB on my iMac MacOS X, AND on my PC with Vista Pro. It works as a charm - I am an FM developer -. I don't have a problem using FM 6 especially since I don't think I need it for advanced applications (does the developer version do SQL type stuff or do you even need it for that if you have a decent webhost? |
|
I am not a webmaster although I do basic HTML, but we do need to upgrade our organization's website. We would like to use javascript forms so that people can enter small amounts of data into a small data set to keep track of requests; this could be done with SQL (which I know nothing about) or javascript-and-a-DAT file (I suppose). Is FM useful for that? I imagine allowing people to upload data via a javascript form would require an SQL database or something. Perhaps our webhost (a standard hosting company) has that. Would FM be able to read and manipulate the resulting data? |
|
However, what we really need an actual program for is our private contact list, which only needs to be on these two machines, and I was hoping to be able to share them across both machines without having to e-mail back and forth (I don't need them to be fully networked, I just mean the file would be on one machine, FM would upload it to an online archive when saved, and if I opened it up on the laptop it would be the same file. Is that how it works?) |
|
Full disclosure, I used to work in web and my family helps run a small community nonprofit and that is what we use the DB for. Now, if you wish to have the database unique on one of the machines, let it there, be sure there no other copy of the DB on the network - as FMP is very quick in finding another copy of a given file, thus jeopardizing the result... -. Then open the 5003 port (reserved to FileMaker) on every firewall - at least the ones on the OS machines themselves plus on the router(s) - Then make the DB 'multiuser' and allow each copy of FM to have the TCP/IP protocole open. At last, run 'File' / 'Open remote' from the remote computer, and open the (remote) DB. Yes, I think I understand! In other words, the file would be saved (not hosted) on one computer, but could be accessed remotely via FM's own TCP/IP connection, as if you would access a file on a LAN. When I access it remotely from home (I would host the file on the laptop to prevent future complications, since it is a newer computer) would be manipulating the only copy of the file and would have to "open remote" and "save remote" during which period it could not be accessed from the computer on which the file is saved (which is not a problem). |
|
Does all of the foregoing require the Advanced edition (or FM6Developer in this case)? |
|
To use it on two machines you need two licences. (There is an exception for one user being permitted to run a copy on a work computer and on a laptop they take home; they can't be used at the same time, nor by two people.) That is indeed the exact case in my situation. It's a single household; one OS9, one laptop. (The other mac I'm using here at home doesn't need a copy of the program.) Can I network the two copies under this exception? No. The second copy will refuse to run at all if the other installed copy is already running on another computer on the same network. Excuse me, I'm probably using inaccurate layman's term for "network". * Would I be able to save the file on a single machine and access it on one other if needed? Not at the same time, but remotely. |
|
* Would the DB be able to automatically read and manipulate data from our website, such as a simple javascript contact form, and save it on that one machine? |
|
You would need to quit FileMaker Pro on the desktop computer before running it on the laptop (or vice versa). Makes sense. I take it all recent versions of FMPro automatically connect to the Internet on launch... |
|
Ah, but that conflicts with what Remi said about multiuser, which would require both programs to be ON in order to access the file, or does it? |
|
if the data is all accessible over a TCP port and/or if FMPro automatically makes an online backup, how do I know it is secure? |
|
You should never use file sharing to access a FileMaker Pro database across a network (copy it to the computer which needs to access it), and you must close the database in FileMaker Pro (or quit the application) before attempting to copy it. Does "open remote" do this as mentioned by Remi above? |
|
If you had two separate licences, the two copies could run at the same time, one of them could host the database and the other could access it over the network (via FileMaker's built-in sharing protocol, not via standard file sharing). And a second license in and of itself would cost full retail price, since the discount is only for large users. |
|
If I purchased a second, opened unused older version of FMPro on Ebay or somewhere, could I use that license to run a second copy of the same FileMaker6 CD, or is each license tied to the software/CD install it comes with? |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
As far as I know, the license codes are unique to each version of FileMaker - you can't enter a FileMaker 8 license code in FileMaker 6, not vice-versa. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
If you have a single licence of FileMaker Pro and have installed it on two computers (work and home), they cannot connect to each other via FileMaker Pro's network support, because they have the same licence key. The only way to get database files back and forth in this configuration is to manually copy them. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
David Empson <dempson (AT) actrix (DOT) gen.nz> wrote: If you have a single licence of FileMaker Pro and have installed it on two computers (work and home), they cannot connect to each other via FileMaker Pro's network support, because they have the same licence key. The only way to get database files back and forth in this configuration is to manually copy them. I use Synchronize Pro to sync various files between my MacMini [open 24/7 as a server] and my MacBook [used when away form 'home']. I use FileMaker Pro 9 Advanced and it is allowed to have up till two installations on different computers. |
|
The number af computers with installations is controlled through 'activation' and 'de-activation' over the internet. |
|
I haven't tried working directly between two installed versions of FM to the same database - but it is fully possible to do it without the need of more than one FMP installations. Just publish the databse [File->Sharing] to the net, be it a LAN or the internet [with port forwarding in the router]. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |