![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am creating a PDF version of our receipts and invoices and our letterhead is designed with all of the information heading down the left side, instead of the more conventional top and bottom. This creates quite an issue for FileMaker... The receipt layout has a header, the body, and a footer. So which one of these three parts can accommodate a top-to-bottom element? It seems that none of them can without adversely affecting the vertical size of any one of them. Has anyone done this before...? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
There is nothing that will do what you're asking for, at least not as a part similar to header, body, footer, etc. In my experience, the function of the parts is to provide for uniform placement of standard elements at the top and bottom of the screen in list view. I don't have any use for them at all in form view. Unless I miss my guess, you're using form, not list, to view and print your documents, so wouldn't simply placing your vertical graphic element down the side of the form accomplish what you want? It will, after all, be there in every document. Matt |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am creating a PDF version of our receipts and invoices and our letterhead is designed with all of the information heading down the left side, instead of the more conventional top and bottom. This creates quite an issue for FileMaker... The receipt layout has a header, the body, and a footer. So which one of these three parts can accommodate a top-to-bottom element? It seems that none of them can without adversely affecting the vertical size of any one of them. Has anyone done this before...? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am creating a PDF version of our receipts and invoices and our letterhead is designed with all of the information heading down the left side, instead of the more conventional top and bottom. This creates quite an issue for FileMaker... The receipt layout has a header, the body, and a footer. So which one of these three parts can accommodate a top-to-bottom element? It seems that none of them can without adversely affecting the vertical size of any one of them. Has anyone done this before...? |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
If you've got pre-printed letterheads that you want to print the Receipt / Invoice on to, then you simply need to change the left or right margin of the layout in Layout -> Layout Set-up to a bigger number. If you're printing the letterhead at the same time as the Receipt / Invoice onto blank paper, then you're a little stuck ... although, a bit of playing with a Global field and a script should be able to get around the problem. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks, Harry -- If I were printing these, then indeed, drop letterhead in the printer and off we go. But as PDF documents, it's not quite so simple. And as for the global field, it sounds like fun...but ultimately not worth it for this relatively trivial matter... |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am creating a PDF version of our receipts and invoices and our letterhead is designed with all of the information heading down the left side, instead of the more conventional top and bottom. This creates quite an issue for FileMaker... The receipt layout has a header, the body, and a footer. So which one of these three parts can accommodate a top-to-bottom element? It seems that none of them can without adversely affecting the vertical size of any one of them. Has anyone done this before...? Rick A. Pleasanton CA |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
I am creating a PDF version of our receipts and invoices and our letterhead is designed with all of the information heading down the left side, instead of the more conventional top and bottom. This creates quite an issue for FileMaker... The receipt layout has a header, the body, and a footer. So which one of these three parts can accommodate a top-to-bottom element? It seems that none of them can without adversely affecting the vertical size of any one of them. Has anyone done this before...? |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
Rick Altman wrote: I am creating a PDF version of our receipts and invoices and our letterhead is designed with all of the information heading down the left side, instead of the more conventional top and bottom. This creates quite an issue for FileMaker... The receipt layout has a header, the body, and a footer. So which one of these three parts can accommodate a top-to-bottom element? It seems that none of them can without adversely affecting the vertical size of any one of them. Has anyone done this before...? I'm coming into this late, so apologies if this has already been suggested. Can you rotate everything on the layout and then print as landscape so that the header really becomes the left side (or right side) of your page? Or if each of the rows in the list will be the same height, you might be able to use either a portal or repeating calc field to form your list. Or, well, wait a minute. If you have your letterhead/masthead as a graphic image, then you can place it on a layout so that only the very top of it resides in a header part. It would then flow down across your body part, and then you might be able to house the excess length within a sub-summary part at the bottom. The sub-sum part won't actually take up space unless you specifically sort by the sub-sum field (so don't do that). But, then, if your list is shorter than a page, this method may also cut off the bottom of the masthead past the final body part. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Howard Schlossberg (818) 883-2846 FM Pro Solutions Los Angeles, California FileMaker 7 Certified Developer Associate Member, FileMaker Solutions Alliance |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |