![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
More rumours about what's in FileMaker 9 from ThinkSecret.com ... Customers will also be able to use the Help menu to transfer FileMaker 9 activations, a new measure FileMaker recently said it will introduce in the future in order to combat "unauthorized distribution of its software". Like other applications that have embraced product activation, FileMaker will give users a 30-day grace period to use the software prior to requiring activation. FileMaker 9 remains on track for a release in the second half of 2007. Oh no! Not the idiotic "activation" nonsense. (Helpful Harry Hopefully helping harassed humans happily handle handiwork hardships ;o) |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'll need to watch this closely, and I hope the customers FMI cares about (corps and maybe FSAs) are giving lots of negative feedback about the activation "feature". I'm not a large customer, and I'm not an "illegal distributor" of FM products, but it's extremely highly unlikely that I'll upgrade to a version of FM that "offers" activation, even if they do something "user friendly" like allowing us to transfer activations without signing onto the Internet or other things. I wish FM would focus on features like built-in graphing (no, not the workarounds we all do now), and restoring phone dialing to the Mac version. This whole activation stuff has me bothered. Seems to bother others as well. I was planning on skipping the upgrade to 8.5 Advanced because it didn't offer me much; now I'll have to watch for 9's activation actions and maybe change my plans. Abbott In article <140220071830559107%helpful_ha... (AT) nom (DOT) de.plume.com>, Helpful Harry <helpful_ha... (AT) nom (DOT) de.plume.com> wrote: More rumours about what's in FileMaker 9 from ThinkSecret.com ... Customers will also be able to use the Help menu to transfer FileMaker 9 activations, a new measure FileMaker recently said it will introduce in the future in order to combat "unauthorized distribution of its software". Like other applications that have embraced product activation, FileMaker will give users a 30-day grace period to use the software prior to requiring activation. FileMaker 9 remains on track for a release in the second half of 2007. Oh no! Not the idiotic "activation" nonsense. (Helpful Harry Hopefully helping harassed humans happily handle handiwork hardships ;o) ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <140220071830559107%helpful_harry (AT) nom (DOT) de.plume.com>, Helpful Harry <helpful_harry (AT) nom (DOT) de.plume.com> wrote: More rumours about what's in FileMaker 9 from ThinkSecret.com ... snip Customers will also be able to use the Help menu to transfer FileMaker 9 activations, a new measure FileMaker recently said it will introduce in the future in order to combat "unauthorized distribution of its software". Like other applications that have embraced product activation, FileMaker will give users a 30-day grace period to use the software prior to requiring activation. FileMaker 9 remains on track for a release in the second half of 2007. Oh no! Not the idiotic "activation" nonsense. (I'll need to watch this closely, and I hope the customers FMI cares about (corps and maybe FSAs) are giving lots of negative feedback about the activation "feature". I'm not a large customer, and I'm not an "illegal distributor" of FM products, but it's extremely highly unlikely that I'll upgrade to a version of FM that "offers" activation, even if they do something "user friendly" like allowing us to transfer activations without signing onto the Internet or other things. I wish FM would focus on features like built-in graphing (no, not the workarounds we all do now), and restoring phone dialing to the Mac version. This whole activation stuff has me bothered. Seems to bother others as well. I was planning on skipping the upgrade to 8.5 Advanced because it didn't offer me much; now I'll have to watch for 9's activation actions and maybe change my plans. |
(
#5
| |||
| |||
|
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
The problem is that I've owned Adobe products for too long. Creative Suite 2 is an upgrade purchase from CS1, and CS1 was an upgrade from PhotoShop. Each CD looks for its qualifying predecessor. Ergo, if I want to install CS2 on a freshly-installed copy of Windows, I have to install some ancient version of Photoshop, then install at least Photoshop from CS1, then finally I get to install CS2... or call in and have the rep give me a code. I'm not sure which is more painful. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Feb 14, 6:37 pm, "Bill Marriott" <w... (AT) wjm (DOT) org> wrote: The problem is that I've owned Adobe products for too long. Creative Suite 2 is an upgrade purchase from CS1, and CS1 was an upgrade from PhotoShop. Each CD looks for its qualifying predecessor. Ergo, if I want to install CS2 on a freshly-installed copy of Windows, I have to install some ancient version of Photoshop, then install at least Photoshop from CS1, then finally I get to install CS2... or call in and have the rep give me a code. I'm not sure which is more painful. Hah! I have the exact same situation. I love when the phone person has to tell you the secret key combination to get to the "back door" ID entry on the installer. The last time I did it, I got the distinct feeling that the phone person thought I was a pirate. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |