![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello Group, I need some help. I've got an Id which is a number field. The Pop up for this field is based on the Id from the 1st field & the name from the 2nd field & is sorted on values using the 2nd field. When I typed the first few letters, the curser jumped to the name in v10. I have now updated to v11 & it wants a number for the search. This list is very long & takes a lot of time to scroll to the desired name. Is there a way to have the same results in v11 without changing the Id field to text ? Thank you for any insight. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article b0ac8e72-d751-4127-9a8d-b662d47c8... (AT) k3g2000prl (DOT) googlegroups.com>, *Keith <francois7... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Hello Group, I need some help. I've got an Id which is a number field. The Pop up for this field is based on the Id from the 1st field & the name from the 2nd field & is sorted on values using the 2nd field. When I typed the first few letters, the curser jumped to the name in v10. I have now updated to v11 & it wants a number for the search. This list is very long & takes a lot of time to scroll to the desired name. Is there a way to have the same results in v11 without changing the Id field to text ? Thank you for any insight. Should work the same way in 11. Make sure the value list is defined correctly and the field is set to use the correct value list. -- Bill Collins |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mar 25, 11:27*am, Bill <bbcoll... (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: In article b0ac8e72-d751-4127-9a8d-b662d47c8... (AT) k3g2000prl (DOT) googlegroups.com>, *Keith <francois7... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Hello Group, I need some help. I've got an Id which is a number field. The Pop up for this field is based on the Id from the 1st field & the name from the 2nd field & is sorted on values using the 2nd field. When I typed the first few letters, the curser jumped to the name in v10. I have now updated to v11 & it wants a number for the search. This list is very long & takes a lot of time to scroll to the desired name. Is there a way to have the same results in v11 without changing the Id field to text ? Thank you for any insight. Should work the same way in 11. Make sure the value list is defined correctly and the field is set to use the correct value list. -- Bill Collins Thank you Bill. I touched nothing, just opened the file in v11 - I just checked, as you suggested, & everything is the same. Even if I open it in v10, it works, Any other suggestions ? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article 090026c3-7967-4e54-a14d-9040ecadf... (AT) v11g2000prb (DOT) googlegroups.com>, *geo6121 <geo6... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: On Mar 25, 11:27 am, Bill <bbcoll... (AT) earthlink (DOT) net> wrote: In article b0ac8e72-d751-4127-9a8d-b662d47c8... (AT) k3g2000prl (DOT) googlegroups.com>, Keith <francois7... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Hello Group, I need some help. I've got an Id which is a number field. The Pop up for this field is based on the Id from the 1st field & the name from the 2nd field & is sorted on values using the 2nd field. When I typed the first few letters, the curser jumped to the name in v10. I have now updated to v11 & it wants a number for the search. This list is very long & takes a lot of time to scroll to the desired name. Is there a way to have the same results in v11 without changing theId field to text ? Thank you for any insight. Should work the same way in 11. Make sure the value list is defined correctly and the field is set to use the correct value list. -- Bill Collins Thank you Bill. I touched nothing, just opened the file in v11 - I just checked, as you suggested, & everything is the same. Even if I open it in v10, it works, Any other suggestions ? Strange. I run FileMaker 11 (running a number of databases from successive earlier versions), and have not had this problem. Some ideas: Try deleting the value list, close the file, then open it and define the value list anew. Maybe that will do some good. You might also want to run a consistency check on the file (you need FMP 11 Adv to do that) to see if that indicates any corruption. Maybe save as a compacted copy. Might be a field indexing problem. For the value list to work, the fields involved have to be indexed. Indexes can get corrupted. Could turn off indexing for the fields, close the file, then open it and set the fields to allow indexing as needed. Could run File>>Recover on the database. That will check consistency of everything and re-index all the fields that need indexing. it will give you a detailed report of what it found. -- Bill Collins |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello Group, I need some help. I've got an Id which is a number field. The Pop up for this field is based on the Id from the 1st field& the name from the 2nd field& is sorted on values using the 2nd field. When I typed the first few letters, the curser jumped to the name in v10. I have now updated to v11& it wants a number for the search. This list is very long& takes a lot of time to scroll to the desired name. Is there a way to have the same results in v11 without changing the Id field to text ? Thank you for any insight. |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello Group, I need some help. I've got an Id which is a number field. The Pop up for this field is based on the Id from the 1st field & the name from the 2nd field & is sorted on values using the 2nd field. When I typed the first few letters, the curser jumped to the name in v10. I have now updated to v11 & it wants a number for the search. This list is very long & takes a lot of time to scroll to the desired name. Is there a way to have the same results in v11 without changing the Id field to text ? Thank you for any insight. |
)
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 26/03/11 12:45 AM, Keith wrote: Hello Group, I need some help. I've got an Id which is a number field. The Pop up for this field is based on the Id from the 1st field& *the name from the 2nd field& *is sorted on values using the 2nd field. When I typed the first few letters, the curser jumped to the name in v10. I have now updated to v11& *it wants a number for the search. This list is very long& *takes a lot of time to scroll to the desired name. Is there a way to have the same results in v11 without changing the Id field to text ? Thank you for any insight. Some twisted issue with indexing? Is the language the same? Try making a copy of the file (set) and opening one in fm10 and the other at fm11, see if the behaviour is the same. To have 2nd field display layered on an id first field, this only works on the pop-up menu (PUM), and not drop down list (DDL) control style; just to carify 'list'. There also is a difference as to whether auto complete is available, based on the PUM or DDL There is also a distinction in the VL between displaying values from the second field, and showing values from the second field. display without show, allows specifying the sort (first of second), display and sort, removes the option to specify first or second sort All of which may be irrelevant... |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
On Mar 25, 6:13 pm, 105<corti... (AT) internode (DOT) on.net> wrote: On 26/03/11 12:45 AM, Keith wrote: Hello Group, I need some help. I've got an Id which is a number field. The Pop up for this field is based on the Id from the 1st field& the name from the 2nd field& is sorted on values using the 2nd field. When I typed the first few letters, the curser jumped to the name in v10. I have now updated to v11& it wants a number for the search. This list is very long& takes a lot of time to scroll to the desired name. Is there a way to have the same results in v11 without changing the Id field to text ? Thank you for any insight. Some twisted issue with indexing? Is the language the same? Try making a copy of the file (set) and opening one in fm10 and the other at fm11, see if the behaviour is the same. To have 2nd field display layered on an id first field, this only works on the pop-up menu (PUM), and not drop down list (DDL) control style; just to carify 'list'. There also is a difference as to whether auto complete is available, based on the PUM or DDL There is also a distinction in the VL between displaying values from the second field, and showing values from the second field. display without show, allows specifying the sort (first of second), display and sort, removes the option to specify first or second sort All of which may be irrelevant... Hello again& thank you for the numerous responses but nothing helped ! I trried *all* of the suggestions& nothing worked ! However, I found a solution (!?). I clicked on 'show values only from second field' which did not work the first time so I clicked on 're- sort values based on' English& it worked. I then unchecked the 're- sort' ... box& it continued working. I don't understand what I did& would certainly like to. The only problem now is that the Id is *not* showing. Thanks again for all of your responses. |
#10
| |||
| |||
|
|
On 27/03/11 3:17 AM, Keith wrote: On Mar 25, 6:13 pm, 105<corti... (AT) internode (DOT) on.net> *wrote: On 26/03/11 12:45 AM, Keith wrote: Hello Group, I need some help. I've got an Id which is a number field. The Pop up for this field is based on the Id from the 1st field& * *the namefrom the 2nd field& * *is sorted on values using the 2nd field. When I typed the first few letters, the curser jumped to the name in v10. I have now updated to v11& * *it wants a number for the search. This list is very long& * *takes a lot of time to scroll to the desired name. Is there a way to have the same results in v11 without changing the Id field to text ? Thank you for any insight. Some twisted issue with indexing? Is the language the same? Try makinga copy of the file (set) and opening one in fm10 and the other at fm11, see if the behaviour is the same. To have 2nd field display layered on an id first field, this only works on the pop-up menu (PUM), and not drop down list (DDL) control style; just to carify 'list'. There also is a difference as to whether auto complete is available, based on the PUM or DDL There is also a distinction in the VL between displaying values from the second field, and showing values from the second field. display without show, allows specifying the sort (first of second), display and sort, removes the option to specify first or second sort All of which may be irrelevant... Hello again& *thank you for the numerous responses but nothing helped ! I trried *all* of the suggestions& *nothing worked ! However, I found a solution (!?). I clicked on 'show values only from second field' which did not work the first time so I clicked on 're- sort values based on' English& *it worked. I then unchecked the 're- sort' ... box& *it continued working. I don't understand what I did& would certainly like to. The only problem now is that the Id is *not* showing. Thanks again for all of your responses. Some twisted issue with indexing? Is the language the same? * |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |