![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have two tables that I have no one field to relate to between them. To relate them I really have to use a combination of four fields. What I did was created a Calculation field and just concatenated the four fields as one text field. The problem is one of the four fields is a number field in both tables. The values in the field are 0.123 (always under 1). In Table A the concatenated linker field pulls in 0.123, but in the calc field in the other table pulls in .123, thus I never get the table to properly relate. Any ideas why one uses 0.123 while the other uses .123 when building the text value in the calc field? When looking at the data both display the number field as 0.123. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have two tables that I have no one field to relate to between them. To relate them I really have to use a combination of four fields. What I did was created a Calculation field and just concatenated the four fields as one text field. The problem is one of the four fields is a number field in both tables. The values in the field are 0.123 (always under 1). In Table A the concatenated linker field pulls in 0.123, but in the calc field in the other table pulls in .123, thus I never get the table to properly relate. Any ideas why one uses 0.123 while the other uses .123 when building the text value in the calc field? When looking at the data both display the number field as 0.123. |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I have two tables that I have no one field to relate to between them. To relate them I really have to use a combination of four fields. What I did was created a Calculation field and just concatenated the four fields as one text field. The problem is one of the four fields is a number field in both tables. The values in the field are 0.123 (always under 1). In Table A the concatenated linker field pulls in 0.123, but in the calc field in the other table pulls in .123, thus I never get the table to properly relate. Any ideas why one uses 0.123 while the other uses .123 when building the text value in the calc field? When looking at the data both display the number field as 0.123. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |