![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
Probably not obvious. When I originally posted the calc, it was something I'd pulled out of my "toolbox". I didn't explain it in that post because it would have taken me way too much thought to figure out why I'd done it that way in the first place. Although it's ironic that the number '42' will all of a sudden become relevant to my life later this week, it's definitely not my pseudonym. |

|
I think so. It was just that your answer did not provide the full answer yet, but the first step for me, concerning the full answer. Maybe this was obvious to you - it wasn't for me. |
|
I'm really quite puzzled as to why you are now explaining to me why you couldn't use int(x). Is 42 a pseudonym of Howard? It was not obvious to me that you knew his conclusions at length. But maybe the problem was just too obvious so that all of you had to come to the same conclusion - which I do understand by now, but which I missed before, not thinking far enough. |
As when you|
Sorry again, |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |