![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
But how do I do the same with sorted summary information? Do I have to loop through all 100,000 records, comparing state names and adding population counts? Seems like there should be a faster method, given that the summary info is sitting right there in the sub-summary parts already calculated. I know I could do it by creating table occurrences and aggregates, but since there are so many different ways I'll be sorting the data, I'm hoping to avoid mass TO creation. (I should note that the above example using state populations is a simplification of the actual dataset.) Any thoughts? Thanks for your help. |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |