dbTalk Databases Forums  

In general, better to upgrade to 7 or 8?

comp.databases.filemaker comp.databases.filemaker


Discuss In general, better to upgrade to 7 or 8? in the comp.databases.filemaker forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
George Nospam
 
Posts: n/a

Default In general, better to upgrade to 7 or 8? - 10-14-2005 , 07:21 AM






Greetings!

My publishing operation is running our home-made integrated solution in
FM Pro 4.0 (under Classic on Mac OS X). It still works, but support for
Classic has deteriorated under Tiger and pretty soon we're going to have
to deal with this. My question is, would we be better off trying to
convert (or rather recreate) our system (which is not too complex, just
some relationally linked modules for invoicing, customer tracking,
inventory, etc.) in FM Pro 7 or 8? (I don't know if 7 is still
available, but our department has an unused license for 7, so we could
conveniently use that. 8 we would have to pay for ourselves.)

I assume 7 and 8 use the same file format, so a database solution
created in 7 would be upwardly portable to 8 without significant
problems? Like 3 to 4 way back when we designed this?

Thanks in advance!

George

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
Bill Marriott
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: In general, better to upgrade to 7 or 8? - 10-14-2005 , 07:29 AM






For a variety of reasons, FileMaker 8 Advanced is the far superior tool for
when you are migrating solutions from legacy versions. FM7 will do automatic
conversion of old files, but they are almost certainly going to need cleanup
and adjustment. The tools in FM8Advanced make it much easier to do that.

Bill

"George Nospam" <gfowler (AT) nospam (DOT) net> wrote

Quote:
Greetings!

My publishing operation is running our home-made integrated solution in
FM Pro 4.0 (under Classic on Mac OS X). It still works, but support for
Classic has deteriorated under Tiger and pretty soon we're going to have
to deal with this. My question is, would we be better off trying to
convert (or rather recreate) our system (which is not too complex, just
some relationally linked modules for invoicing, customer tracking,
inventory, etc.) in FM Pro 7 or 8? (I don't know if 7 is still
available, but our department has an unused license for 7, so we could
conveniently use that. 8 we would have to pay for ourselves.)

I assume 7 and 8 use the same file format, so a database solution
created in 7 would be upwardly portable to 8 without significant
problems? Like 3 to 4 way back when we designed this?

Thanks in advance!

George



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
manet
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: In general, better to upgrade to 7 or 8? - 10-15-2005 , 03:59 AM



Bill Marriott <wjm (AT) wjm (DOT) org> wrote:

Quote:
FileMaker 8 Advanced is the far superior tool for
when you are migrating solutions from legacy versions.
I've to migrate from FMP6 and I just get FMP8.

I think you are quite right !!!
--
Philippe Manet


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Bill Marriott
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: In general, better to upgrade to 7 or 8? - 10-15-2005 , 04:07 AM



Be sure to take advantage of the (first time ever offered) upgrade from
FileMaker 6 Standard to FileMaker 8 Advanced as only Advanced has the
ability to copy/paste the field definitions, script steps, tables, etc.
These and other developer tools are what I'm speaking of when recommending
this path.

Bill

"manet" <pmanet (AT) invivo (DOT) edu> wrote

Quote:
Bill Marriott <wjm (AT) wjm (DOT) org> wrote:

FileMaker 8 Advanced is the far superior tool for
when you are migrating solutions from legacy versions.

I've to migrate from FMP6 and I just get FMP8.

I think you are quite right !!!
--
Philippe Manet



Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.