![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm not usually a Windows user, but I've to use it sometimes... My PIV box works (...) with XP SP1, and specs of FMP8 speaks of SP 2. Is it a real problem ? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
I'm not usually a Windows user, but I've to use it sometimes... My PIV box works (...) with XP SP1, and specs of FMP8 speaks of SP 2. Is it a real problem ? -- Philippe Manet |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
FM8 won't work with Xp SP1, you need to download and update XP to SP2 "manet" <pmanet (AT) invivo (DOT) edu> a écrit dans le message de news: 20051010234412435263@[10.0.0.1]... I'm not usually a Windows user, but I've to use it sometimes... My PIV box works (...) with XP SP1, and specs of FMP8 speaks of SP 2. Is it a real problem ? -- Philippe Manet |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hey all, I'm certain many users, like myself have functionality wishes for FileMaker. Rather than bitch and moan, I'm looking to cull a positive and proactive list of features that many users are looking for in the next iteration of FileMaker. I'm not associated with FileMaker in any way other than a loyal customer. You can leave your comments on the blog entry of the first few requests (entered by myself) over at: http://www.secretweaponlabs.com/word...ture-wishlist/ For those interested, my list so far includes: - Native printer switching capability - A central repository/library of graphics used in a solution - Native client-side rendering of gradients so we don't have to rely on gradients and whatever else I think of until next time. Your time and comments are always appreciated. Regards, Denis -- Every Company Needs A Secret Weapon SecretWeaponLabs.com |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |