![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi All, does anyone use FileMaker AND Macromedia Director? regards Chris Brown University of Adelaide |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Yes, but I haven't tried to do anything combining them. I assume you mean building data-driven Director projects, |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <qtudnZAyJM7nFOzenZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>, wjm (AT) wjm (DOT) org says... Yes, but I haven't tried to do anything combining them. I assume you mean building data-driven Director projects, FWIW FM rarely makes the most sense for a database engine that is only going to be accessed via ODBC. (If you are using FM elsewhere, by all means... use the odbc support to push the data out ... but its really not the right tool if its primary goal is to be the database backend to sql queries via odbc). FM can do it, and its improved dramatically over the last few versions, but FM's strength is still in its proprietary client/server technology, and its ease of use with respect to IWP etc, and not its ODBC support. Its ODBC is not going to win any speed races, nor any features or standards implemented showdowns against the likes of mysql, postgresql, or ms sql server... |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
42 wrote: In article <qtudnZAyJM7nFOzenZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d (AT) comcast (DOT) com>, wjm (AT) wjm (DOT) org says... Yes, but I haven't tried to do anything combining them. I assume you mean building data-driven Director projects, FWIW FM rarely makes the most sense for a database engine that is only going to be accessed via ODBC. (If you are using FM elsewhere, by all means... use the odbc support to push the data out ... but its really not the right tool if its primary goal is to be the database backend to sql queries via odbc). FM can do it, and its improved dramatically over the last few versions, but FM's strength is still in its proprietary client/server technology, and its ease of use with respect to IWP etc, and not its ODBC support. Its ODBC is not going to win any speed races, nor any features or standards implemented showdowns against the likes of mysql, postgresql, or ms sql server... I have an academic user who runs both at the same time (it is a major work flow) and for a considerable time, FM has been grinding to a halt/crashing if MM is open - which it needs to be as he passes info including a considerable amount of graphic content between the two. This is a Patient diagnoses/training and graphic resource pair. He is on a Mac powerBook running 10.4.3. Being the FM developer I am fairly sure it is the MM projectors that are causing a very system level resource issue. the MM developer sees it from a somewhat different perspetive (naturally). MM appears to hog all avaliable CPU ... I really looking for someone who runs both together on a similar system, without problems. We are rather at a loss as to where to go next; current favoured solution is just buy another laptop and run MM on one and FM on the other; tedious ongoing swapping, and considerable o/s travel may this undesirable, but if there is no other way - mandatory regards Chris |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |