![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
OK, FM has cost us all lots of hours of work by changing the rules of various little things like, you konw, the most common script step ever, for instance. And small things like being able to lock yourself out of a record--that's fun stuff, and making windows not open the same way they used to, all in the name of progress or something... But I just found out they broke stuff in Find too. Today's problem is that my users can no longer search for their data that might contain "FC#03" because the number (pound) sign (#) is now used to represent "a digit" in the find. So I tried the following: FC@03 "FC#03" neither one works. No records are found. Is there any way to search for data that has a pound sign in it now? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks for the reply, but I find it erroneous. I just opened up FM 6 (my previous version) and there is no # listed as a special Find character, so "always" was stretching it. It may have appeared as a special Find character in FM 7, but I don't know since I skipped that version since it didn't offer me enough to make it worth my while. (but thanks for the "ummmm...", it made me feel special, warm and fuzzy inside). I will try indexing the field as ASCII when I get back to work, but I am not hopeful since # is now a special Find character in v8. |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thanks for the reply, but I find it erroneous. I just opened up FM 6 (my previous version) and there is no # listed as a special Find character, so "always" was stretching it. It may have appeared as a special Find character in FM 7, but I don't know since I skipped that version since it didn't offer me enough to make it worth my while. (but thanks for the "ummmm...", it made me feel special, warm and fuzzy inside). I will try indexing the field as ASCII when I get back to work, but I am not hopeful since # is now a special Find character in v8. |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
I just tested in 8.5 and a search for "HS#85" works fine when surrounded by quotes in find mode, regardless of what the field's indexing is set to. I was mistaken in thinking '#' was a valid find symbol in FM6; I just checked and it was not. I was also mistaken to say that ASCII indexing is available in FM8; it no longer is, and the newer unicode indexing is said to behave the same way as the old ASCII. This, however, will not find the pound character unless it is wrapped in quotes. |
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
On May 20, 7:38 pm, Howard Schlossberg how... (AT) nospam (DOT) fmprosolutions.com> wrote: I just tested in 8.5 and a search for "HS#85" works fine when surrounded by quotes in find mode, regardless of what the field's indexing is set to. I was mistaken in thinking '#' was a valid find symbol in FM6; I just checked and it was not. I was also mistaken to say that ASCII indexing is available in FM8; it no longer is, and the newer unicode indexing is said to behave the same way as the old ASCII. This, however, will not find the pound character unless it is wrapped in quotes. Thank you Howard, I'll give that a try. I think I'm going to be still in trouble though because those darn users are searching for HS#85 in order to find HS#8529383 HS#8511228 HS#8599492 etc so I think the quotes are going to kill me. I truly appreciate your time and effort Howard, I think my last response was more snipy than it should have been, I'm sorry about that. |
#9
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |