Filemaker 9 conversion

#1

If you were building a solution in 8.5 knowing that you might convert
it to Fm 9.0 when it releases, what kind of things would keep in mind
concerning the adaptability of SQL. ie. naming conventions etc.

thanks

#2

In article
<1181917992.104767.31290 (AT) m36g2000hse (DOT) googlegroups.com>jc (AT) agncs (DOT) com
wrote:

Quote:

If you were building a solution in 8.5 knowing that you might
convert it to Fm 9.0 when it releases, what kind of things would keep
in mindconcerning the adaptability of SQL. ie. naming conventions
etc.

thanks

As a friend is fond of saying, "Hard tellin', not knowin'."

All we have to go on so far is rumors. This is how the FileMaker
community lives from version to version.
Since nobody knows for sure what FileMaker 9 will look like, it is
somewhat difficult to advise you how to plan for it.
Matt

--
I'm trying a new usenet client for Mac, Nemo OS X.
You can download it at http://www.malcom-mac.com/nemo

#3

"Matt WIlls" <Im (AT) Witz (DOT) End> schreef in bericht
news:nemoFri061507113209 (AT) news (DOT) verizon.net...

Quote:

In article
1181917992.104767.31290 (AT) m36g200...gncs (DOT) com
wrote:

If you were building a solution in 8.5 knowing that you might
convert it to Fm 9.0 when it releases, what kind of things would keep
in mindconcerning the adaptability of SQL. ie. naming conventions
etc.

thanks

As a friend is fond of saying, "Hard tellin', not knowin'."

All we have to go on so far is rumors. This is how the FileMaker
community lives from version to version.
Since nobody knows for sure what FileMaker 9 will look like, it is
somewhat difficult to advise you how to plan for it.
Matt

--
I'm trying a new usenet client for Mac, Nemo OS X.
You can download it at http://www.malcom-mac.com/nemo

Just stick yo common practice and common sense.

Keep Well, Ursus

#4

On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:53:12 +0200, "Ursus" <ursus.kirk (AT) wanadoo (DOT) nl>
wrote:

Quote:

"Matt WIlls" <Im (AT) Witz (DOT) End> schreef in bericht
news:nemoFri061507113209 (AT) news (DOT) verizon.net...
In article
1181917992.104767.31290 (AT) m36g200...gncs (DOT) com
wrote:

If you were building a solution in 8.5 knowing that you might
convert it to Fm 9.0 when it releases, what kind of things would keep
in mindconcerning the adaptability of SQL. ie. naming conventions
etc.

thanks

As a friend is fond of saying, "Hard tellin', not knowin'."

All we have to go on so far is rumors. This is how the FileMaker
community lives from version to version.
Since nobody knows for sure what FileMaker 9 will look like, it is
somewhat difficult to advise you how to plan for it.
Matt

--
I'm trying a new usenet client for Mac, Nemo OS X.
You can download it at http://www.malcom-mac.com/nemo

Just stick yo common practice and common sense.

Keep Well, Ursus

Nothing common about either one of those, man.

--
FW

#5

<jc (AT) agncs (DOT) com> wrote:

Quote:

If you were building a solution in 8.5 knowing that you might convert
it to Fm 9.0 when it releases, what kind of things would keep in mind
concerning the adaptability of SQL. ie. naming conventions etc.

thanks

If memory serves me correct the FMP Naming Conventions white paper
already has some suggestions for SQL problem avoidance. You can still
download it from FM's website.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Filemaker 9 conversion

comp.databases.filemaker comp.databases.filemaker

Filemaker 9 conversion - 06-15-2007 , 09:33 AM

Re: Filemaker 9 conversion - 06-15-2007 , 10:35 AM

Re: Filemaker 9 conversion - 06-15-2007 , 12:53 PM

Re: Re: Filemaker 9 conversion - 06-16-2007 , 12:40 AM

Re: Filemaker 9 conversion - 06-16-2007 , 01:38 AM