dbTalk Databases Forums  

Compare FMP with Paradox and Access

comp.databases.filemaker comp.databases.filemaker


Discuss Compare FMP with Paradox and Access in the comp.databases.filemaker forum.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old   
Terry Cano
 
Posts: n/a

Default Compare FMP with Paradox and Access - 07-01-2005 , 09:36 PM







O.k. no wars here !

My needs are not much...a few flat flies and some relationship files (no
more than three tables)
I'm using Paradox 8 now....I have never liked MS Access seems overly
complicated
and I have heard later verisions of Paradox are buggy....

I would like nicer looking reports than I can get in Paradox 8.
I have never used FM but I have heard good things about it.
BTW, OS is Windows XP



Thanks

Terry Cano



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old   
42
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Compare FMP with Paradox and Access - 07-02-2005 , 10:07 AM






In article <r4nxe.38182$J12.14963 (AT) newssvr14 (DOT) news.prodigy.com>,
tcmusic (AT) pacbell (DOT) net says...
Quote:
O.k. no wars here !

My needs are not much...a few flat flies and some relationship files (no
more than three tables)

I'm using Paradox 8 now....I have never liked MS Access seems overly
complicated
Ease of use is FM's strong suit.

Quote:
and I have heard later verisions of Paradox are buggy....

I would like nicer looking reports than I can get in Paradox 8.
FM's reporting is reasonably capable. There is something of a learning
curve for mastering the combination of sort order, found set, summary
fields and sub-summary layout parts to get the values you want as you do
more advanced reports. But there are few reports I haven't been able to
do in FM.

There are limitations though, and if you want graphing or something
really exotic you'll want to export data and deal with it in an
appropriate tool.. be it crystal reports or excel or whatever.

If you've only got 3 tables, and you're self describing as someone whose
"needs are not much" I'd predict that your report requirements will be
more than covered by FM.

Quote:
I have never used FM but I have heard good things about it.
BTW, OS is Windows XP
Download the FM7 Pro trial. Don't hesistate to ask any questions you
have.


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old   
Terry Cano
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Compare FMP with Paradox and Access - 07-02-2005 , 05:21 PM



Thank you. Excatly the information I was looking for.
Terry
"42" <nospam (AT) nospam (DOT) com> wrote

Quote:
In article <r4nxe.38182$J12.14963 (AT) newssvr14 (DOT) news.prodigy.com>,
tcmusic (AT) pacbell (DOT) net says...

O.k. no wars here !

My needs are not much...a few flat flies and some relationship files (no
more than three tables)

I'm using Paradox 8 now....I have never liked MS Access seems overly
complicated

Ease of use is FM's strong suit.

and I have heard later verisions of Paradox are buggy....

I would like nicer looking reports than I can get in Paradox 8.

FM's reporting is reasonably capable. There is something of a learning
curve for mastering the combination of sort order, found set, summary
fields and sub-summary layout parts to get the values you want as you do
more advanced reports. But there are few reports I haven't been able to
do in FM.

There are limitations though, and if you want graphing or something
really exotic you'll want to export data and deal with it in an
appropriate tool.. be it crystal reports or excel or whatever.

If you've only got 3 tables, and you're self describing as someone whose
"needs are not much" I'd predict that your report requirements will be
more than covered by FM.

I have never used FM but I have heard good things about it.
BTW, OS is Windows XP

Download the FM7 Pro trial. Don't hesistate to ask any questions you
have.



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old   
Terry Cano
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Compare FMP with Paradox and Access - 07-02-2005 , 05:54 PM




I D/L demo but Setup file won't run...
not an XP or 2000 machine on the net so maybe
FMP7 doesn't run on ME
Terry



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old   
ursus.kirk
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Compare FMP with Paradox and Access - 07-03-2005 , 04:32 AM



correct,

FM7 does need xp, but fm6 does run on ME and should be fairly cheap on e-bay
(or an other second-hand site)

Ursus

"Terry Cano" <tcmusic (AT) pacbell (DOT) net> schreef in bericht
newsWExe.38413$J12.30015 (AT) newssvr14 (DOT) news.prodigy.com...
Quote:
I D/L demo but Setup file won't run...
not an XP or 2000 machine on the net so maybe
FMP7 doesn't run on ME
Terry





Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old   
42
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Compare FMP with Paradox and Access - 07-03-2005 , 03:52 PM



In article <pWExe.38413$J12.30015 (AT) newssvr14 (DOT) news.prodigy.com>,
tcmusic (AT) pacbell (DOT) net says...
Quote:
I D/L demo but Setup file won't run...
not an XP or 2000 machine on the net so maybe
FMP7 doesn't run on ME
Terry
You specifically said "BTW OS is XP" in your original post. Try it on
that machine


Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.