![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello everyone- I've designed a FileMaker (8.5, Windows) database for storing orders our company receives. Along with the order record itself, several other records (line items, installations, purchase orders, stored faxed documents) are created for each order. Before rolling this out onto our network I decided to "stress test" it. I ran a script to create 20,000 orders, along with a proportional number of associated records (eg 60,000 line items, etc.) What I found is that the file size increases by about 15 KB per order, so that with 20,000 orders the file is around 300 MB. My question: is this OK? Is this an acceptable and manageable size, or is it going to cause problems down the road? I just need a frame of reference. Is 300 MB for a 20,000 order database small, normal, too big? Thanks in advance for any input, Nate |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello everyone- I've designed a FileMaker (8.5, Windows) database for storing orders our company receives. Along with the order record itself, several other records (line items, installations, purchase orders, stored faxed documents) are created for each order. Before rolling this out onto our network I decided to "stress test" it. I ran a script to create 20,000 orders, along with a proportional number of associated records (eg 60,000 line items, etc.) What I found is that the file size increases by about 15 KB per order, so that with 20,000 orders the file is around 300 MB. My question: is this OK? Is this an acceptable and manageable size, or is it going to cause problems down the road? I just need a frame of reference. Is 300 MB for a 20,000 order database small, normal, too big? Thanks in advance for any input, Nate |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
In article <1172153675.037801.192... (AT) t69g2000cwt (DOT) googlegroups.com>, "NScheffey" <NSchef... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Hello everyone- I've designed a FileMaker (8.5, Windows) database for storing orders our company receives. Along with the order record itself, several other records (line items, installations, purchase orders, stored faxed documents) are created for each order. Before rolling this out onto our network I decided to "stress test" it. I ran a script to create 20,000 orders, along with a proportional number of associated records (eg 60,000 line items, etc.) What I found is that the file size increases by about 15 KB per order, so that with 20,000 orders the file is around 300 MB. My question: is this OK? Is this an acceptable and manageable size, or is it going to cause problems down the road? I just need a frame of reference. Is 300 MB for a 20,000 order database small, normal, too big? Thanks in advance for any input, Nate Ursus has already given a pretty comprehensive roundup of size limits. There is one thing to think about: do you really need all 20,000+ records to be available?? It's often a good idea to archive old records to another file where they aren't adding to the workload of the active system. Helpful Harry Hopefully helping harassed humans happily handle handiwork hardships ;o) |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Thank you Ursus and Harry for your replies. So it sounds like this is an acceptable increase in file size per order, and won't render the system unusable or horribly slow over our LAN. That's what I wanted to hear. I'm also intrigued by the idea of archiving after a set number of orders, or perhaps a certain amount of time, since it is relatively rare that we will need to consult a closed order from 6 months ago (although it does happen). Would this entail creating a set of Export Records-type scripts, or is it as simple as copying the file, saving the old version, and deleting orders older than X from the new file? Maybe I should search to see if that has been covered elsewhere. Thanks again guys, Nate |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |