![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Anyone!!! Do any one know if i can use more than one pervasive servers and do kind of loadbalancing on same database. I have a big site with 500+ users so i am little concern!!! - Kintu |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Currently Pevasive does not support load-balance clustering in the strictest sense. There are some options though: 1) You could use the DataExchange product to distribute the database to a second server. Your database may however be in violation to some required database properties for full-sync DataExchange. May be helpful though if you'd use the second server for read-only operations or write to totally different tables. Possibly reporting or data-mining. |
|
2) Pervasive performance mainly depends on speed of network, amount of memory, speed of disks (in that order). Speed of CPU is not often an issue, certainly not if the server is dedicated to Pervasive. With 500+ users, server OS issues may become visible. Early tests clearly showed NetWare servers were less prone to degenerating performance under heavy load than Windows servers. Have not seen any recent tests though, so Windows may have improved and Linux may even be better than NetWare. So: a) decrease or split network load b) add memory c) decrease OS load d) replace disks or use a faster RAID configuration I have seen 1500 users on a single server with 30+ GB of data so I |
| On 14 Nov 2004 21:24:22 -0800, kintukshah (AT) yahoo (DOT) com (Kintu Shah) wrote: Anyone!!! Do any one know if i can use more than one pervasive servers and do kind of loadbalancing on same database. I have a big site with 500+ users so i am little concern!!! - Kintu Gordon Bos Q-RY Solutions +31-(0)15-2564035 http://www.q-ry.nl/ |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |