![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, on a novell-server running Pervasive SQL 9.10.020 we observed, that creating (internal) indixes of btrieve-files lasts very long. First we assumed, that the requester sends the command to a local installed local engine, but there is no local engine installed. Further there is no process running local, that consumes CPT-time, so now we guess, that the server engine on that novell-server is "sick". Another strange thing is, that in the PPC there is no possibility to access the servers configuration (connecting to it with (novell-server-)admin rights is possible, the server is shown, but only "databases": selecting the server the click to "configure local engine" is ignored: nothing happens). In the mikrokernal router, we have already disabled "use loacl engine" (for shure, although there is no local engine running). All other btrieve-things are running well as far as I see. What could be wrong? OK, we should update to 9.52, and will do soon. But maybe there is something other, that I can do, try, ... Regards Mircea |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, on a novell-server running Pervasive SQL 9.10.020 we observed, that creating (internal) indixes of btrieve-files lasts very long. First we assumed, that the requester sends the command to a local installed local engine, but there is no local engine installed. Further there is no process running local, that consumes CPT-time, so now we guess, that the server engine on that novell-server is "sick". Another strange thing is, that in the PPC there is no possibility to access the servers configuration (connecting to it with (novell-server-)admin rights is possible, the server is shown, but only "databases": selecting the server the click to "configure local engine" is ignored: nothing happens). In the mikrokernal router, we have already disabled "use loacl engine" (for shure, although there is no local engine running). All other btrieve-things are running well as far as I see. What could be wrong? OK, we should update to 9.52, and will do soon. But maybe there is something other, that I can do, try, ... Regards Mircea |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, on a novell-server running Pervasive SQL 9.10.020 we observed, that creating (internal) indixes of btrieve-files lasts very long. First we assumed, that the requester sends the command to a local installed local engine, but there is no local engine installed. Further there is no process running local, that consumes CPT-time, so now we guess, that the server engine on that novell-server is "sick". Another strange thing is, that in the PPC there is no possibility to access the servers configuration (connecting to it with (novell-server-)admin rights is possible, the server is shown, but only "databases": selecting the server the click to "configure local engine" is ignored: nothing happens). In the mikrokernal router, we have already disabled "use loacl engine" (for shure, although there is no local engine running). All other btrieve-things are running well as far as I see. What could be wrong? OK, we should update to 9.52, and will do soon. But maybe there is something other, that I can do, try, ... Regards Mircea |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, on a novell-server running Pervasive SQL 9.10.020 we observed, that creating (internal) indixes of btrieve-files lasts very long. First we assumed, that the requester sends the command to a local installed local engine, but there is no local engine installed. Further there is no process running local, that consumes CPT-time, so now we guess, that the server engine on that novell-server is "sick". Another strange thing is, that in the PPC there is no possibility to access the servers configuration (connecting to it with (novell-server-)admin rights is possible, the server is shown, but only "databases": selecting the server the click to "configure local engine" is ignored: nothing happens). In the mikrokernal router, we have already disabled "use loacl engine" (for shure, although there is no local engine running). All other btrieve-things are running well as far as I see. What could be wrong? OK, we should update to 9.52, and will do soon. But maybe there is something other, that I can do, try, ... Regards Mircea |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, on a novell-server running Pervasive SQL 9.10.020 we observed, that creating (internal) indixes of btrieve-files lasts very long. First we assumed, that the requester sends the command to a local installed local engine, but there is no local engine installed. Further there is no process running local, that consumes CPT-time, so now we guess, that the server engine on that novell-server is "sick". Another strange thing is, that in the PPC there is no possibility to access the servers configuration (connecting to it with (novell-server-)admin rights is possible, the server is shown, but only "databases": selecting the server the click to "configure local engine" is ignored: nothing happens). In the mikrokernal router, we have already disabled "use loacl engine" (for shure, although there is no local engine running). All other btrieve-things are running well as far as I see. What could be wrong? OK, we should update to 9.52, and will do soon. But maybe there is something other, that I can do, try, ... Regards Mircea |
#7
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi, on a novell-server running Pervasive SQL 9.10.020 we observed, that creating (internal) indixes of btrieve-files lasts very long. First we assumed, that the requester sends the command to a local installed local engine, but there is no local engine installed. Further there is no process running local, that consumes CPT-time, so now we guess, that the server engine on that novell-server is "sick". Another strange thing is, that in the PPC there is no possibility to access the servers configuration (connecting to it with (novell-server-)admin rights is possible, the server is shown, but only "databases": selecting the server the click to "configure local engine" is ignored: nothing happens). In the mikrokernal router, we have already disabled "use loacl engine" (for shure, although there is no local engine running). All other btrieve-things are running well as far as I see. What could be wrong? OK, we should update to 9.52, and will do soon. But maybe there is something other, that I can do, try, ... Regards Mircea |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |