![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello, Can anyone shed a light on whether to use or not to use DataExchange ? Is it a mature product ? My customer is currently testing it. They see one problem with it - if databases go out of sync , then re-synchronization takes too much time - more than 15 hours (16GB of data). It's plain too long to use it in production. Are there workarounds? Thanks in advance Przem |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
We have several customers using it successfully. I am intrigued by your customers experience -- why do the databases go "out of sync"? Since the database is continually keeping track of database changes on both side of the link, and since the database keeps 90 days of changes, as long as you initiate replication once every 80 days or so, then you shouldn't ever need to perform a Full Push Replication -- a normal replication should cover all of the changes that have been pending. Goldstar Software Inc. Building on Btrieve(R) for the Future(SM) Bill Bach BillBach (AT) goldstarsoftware (DOT) com http://www.goldstarsoftware.com *** Chicago: Pervasive.SQL Service & Support - July 19-22 *** *** Chicago: Pervasive DataExchange Class - July 27-29 *** Przem wrote: Hello, Can anyone shed a light on whether to use or not to use DataExchange ? Is it a mature product ? My customer is currently testing it. They see one problem with it - if databases go out of sync , then re-synchronization takes too much time - more than 15 hours (16GB of data). It's plain too long to use it in production. Are there workarounds? Thanks in advance Przem |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hello, thanks for a reply, a bit of delay... My customer just wants to know how long will it take to bring back his data from backup after server's crash. Suppose you have a server, a 1-seat backup server and DataExchange backup edition. Then your main server dies. All data is gone. We have backup on another server. So you have to restore data from backup server and restore DataExchange config , so that before people start working data is in sync again. Unless I'm mistaken, simple copying files with Explorer from backup server to restored server won't do the trick. Or will it? Thanks in advance Przem "Bill Bach" <billbach (AT) goldstarsoftware (DOT) com> wrote in message news:<da1bh2$qom (AT) dispatch (DOT) concentric.net>... We have several customers using it successfully. I am intrigued by your customers experience -- why do the databases go "out of sync"? Since the database is continually keeping track of database changes on both side of the link, and since the database keeps 90 days of changes, as long as you initiate replication once every 80 days or so, then you shouldn't ever need to perform a Full Push Replication -- a normal replication should cover all of the changes that have been pending. Goldstar Software Inc. Building on Btrieve(R) for the Future(SM) Bill Bach BillBach (AT) goldstarsoftware (DOT) com http://www.goldstarsoftware.com *** Chicago: Pervasive.SQL Service & Support - July 19-22 *** *** Chicago: Pervasive DataExchange Class - July 27-29 *** Przem wrote: Hello, Can anyone shed a light on whether to use or not to use DataExchange ? Is it a mature product ? My customer is currently testing it. They see one problem with it - if databases go out of sync , then re-synchronization takes too much time - more than 15 hours (16GB of data). It's plain too long to use it in production. Are there workarounds? Thanks in advance Przem |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |