![]() | |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi All, I had a Redhat 7.3 with Pervasive.SQL v8.5 server. I've one concern about this installation, When I connect my Pervasive Monitor that is on a windows machine and check on Resource Usage I see that File Handles is set only at 200 Maximum on the RedHat machine. The /var/log/messages of the RedHat is showing this kind of messages "mkded: Cannot set file handle limit 1024, the current limit is 1024." I beleived that File Handle seetings is being handled dymanically by Pervasive. but with only 200 is set I think I'm gonna have a problem with this. Is this a bug on Pervasive v8? Thanks |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
The number of files is dynamic on all Pervasive.SQL V8 environments. You should be able to ignore this "maximum setting". Goldstar Software Inc. Building on Btrieve(R) for the Future(SM) Bill Bach BillBach (AT) goldstarsoftware (DOT) com http://www.goldstarsoftware.com *** Pervasive.SQL Service & Support Classes *** Chicago: March, 2004: See our web site for details! jhun bacala wrote: Hi All, I had a Redhat 7.3 with Pervasive.SQL v8.5 server. I've one concern about this installation, When I connect my Pervasive Monitor that is on a windows machine and check on Resource Usage I see that File Handles is set only at 200 Maximum on the RedHat machine. The /var/log/messages of the RedHat is showing this kind of messages "mkded: Cannot set file handle limit 1024, the current limit is 1024." I beleived that File Handle seetings is being handled dymanically by Pervasive. but with only 200 is set I think I'm gonna have a problem with this. Is this a bug on Pervasive v8? Thanks |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
The number of files is dynamic on all Pervasive.SQL V8 environments. You should be able to ignore this "maximum setting". Goldstar Software Inc. Building on Btrieve(R) for the Future(SM) Bill Bach BillBach (AT) goldstarsoftware (DOT) com http://www.goldstarsoftware.com *** Pervasive.SQL Service & Support Classes *** Chicago: March, 2004: See our web site for details! jhun bacala wrote: Hi All, I had a Redhat 7.3 with Pervasive.SQL v8.5 server. I've one concern about this installation, When I connect my Pervasive Monitor that is on a windows machine and check on Resource Usage I see that File Handles is set only at 200 Maximum on the RedHat machine. The /var/log/messages of the RedHat is showing this kind of messages "mkded: Cannot set file handle limit 1024, the current limit is 1024." I beleived that File Handle seetings is being handled dymanically by Pervasive. but with only 200 is set I think I'm gonna have a problem with this. Is this a bug on Pervasive v8? Thanks |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
While you can ignore the maximum setting for Pervasive as the database engine is dynamic, Linux will enforce the file handle limit of 1024. With overhead this works out to be around 1000 physical database files. If you need more (not likely but possible) you will need to add a ulimit statement to increase the OS limit in the /etc/rc.d/init.d/psql startup script. Leonard On 24 Feb 2004 11:02:05 EST, Bill Bach <bbach (AT) cncdsl (DOT) com> wrote: The number of files is dynamic on all Pervasive.SQL V8 environments. You should be able to ignore this "maximum setting". Goldstar Software Inc. Building on Btrieve(R) for the Future(SM) Bill Bach BillBach (AT) goldstarsoftware (DOT) com http://www.goldstarsoftware.com *** Pervasive.SQL Service & Support Classes *** Chicago: March, 2004: See our web site for details! jhun bacala wrote: Hi All, I had a Redhat 7.3 with Pervasive.SQL v8.5 server. I've one concern about this installation, When I connect my Pervasive Monitor that is on a windows machine and check on Resource Usage I see that File Handles is set only at 200 Maximum on the RedHat machine. The /var/log/messages of the RedHat is showing this kind of messages "mkded: Cannot set file handle limit 1024, the current limit is 1024." I beleived that File Handle seetings is being handled dymanically by Pervasive. but with only 200 is set I think I'm gonna have a problem with this. Is this a bug on Pervasive v8? Thanks |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
Hi Leonard, I'm very much interested on your suggestion, perhaps you can show me how to add a ulimit statement in the /etc/rc.d/init.d/psql Thanks Jhun Bacala Leonard <lharvey (AT) austin (DOT) rr.com> wrote While you can ignore the maximum setting for Pervasive as the database engine is dynamic, Linux will enforce the file handle limit of 1024. With overhead this works out to be around 1000 physical database files. If you need more (not likely but possible) you will need to add a ulimit statement to increase the OS limit in the /etc/rc.d/init.d/psql startup script. Leonard On 24 Feb 2004 11:02:05 EST, Bill Bach <bbach (AT) cncdsl (DOT) com> wrote: The number of files is dynamic on all Pervasive.SQL V8 environments. You should be able to ignore this "maximum setting". Goldstar Software Inc. Building on Btrieve(R) for the Future(SM) Bill Bach BillBach (AT) goldstarsoftware (DOT) com http://www.goldstarsoftware.com *** Pervasive.SQL Service & Support Classes *** Chicago: March, 2004: See our web site for details! jhun bacala wrote: Hi All, I had a Redhat 7.3 with Pervasive.SQL v8.5 server. I've one concern about this installation, When I connect my Pervasive Monitor that is on a windows machine and check on Resource Usage I see that File Handles is set only at 200 Maximum on the RedHat machine. The /var/log/messages of the RedHat is showing this kind of messages "mkded: Cannot set file handle limit 1024, the current limit is 1024." I beleived that File Handle seetings is being handled dymanically by Pervasive. but with only 200 is set I think I'm gonna have a problem with this. Is this a bug on Pervasive v8? Thanks |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |