![]() | |
#1
| |||
| |||
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
|
What am i doing wrong? |
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
* Mykola Stryebkov: What am i doing wrong? Have you enabled the deadlock detector? |
#4
| |||
| |||
|
|
Florian Weimer wrote: * Mykola Stryebkov: What am i doing wrong? Have you enabled the deadlock detector? No. What's this? |
#5
| |||
| |||
|
|
* Mykola Stryebkov: Florian Weimer wrote: * Mykola Stryebkov: What am i doing wrong? Have you enabled the deadlock detector? No. What's this? During concurrent access to the database, deadlocks may occur. You need to handle them in some way. The Berkeley DB reference guide contains detailed information: http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/ref/tr.../deadlock.html |
#6
| |||
| |||
|
|
During concurrent access to the database, deadlocks may occur. You need to handle them in some way. The Berkeley DB reference guide contains detailed information: http://www.sleepycat.com/docs/ref/tr.../deadlock.html Thanks, I know about deadlocks nature but very new in concurrent BDB handling. What whould you say about using db_deadlock utility for resolving occured deadlocks? I'm thinking about use it with -t flag. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |